oh man.
i really, *really* should have known better. the amazon reviews of Natural Childbirth the Bradley(r) Way, by Susan McCutcheon warned me that it was a bit out of date and very pro “natural” (ie: no medical assistance) child birth. still, i gave it a chance. it was one of highest rated/reviewed books on the bradley method, and i wanted to do a bit of research.
what i was ultimately looking for was an elaboration on what some other books hand hinted at: that bradley was about breathing with/through your contractions, and that it was coach centered. i wanted something to give me a bit of guidance for how to best meditate through my contractions. i wanted something that might give ryan and me ideas about what specific role he can play in the labor/birthing process.
what i got was seriously messed up science, painful bias and ultimately nothing of use.
the book was first published in 1984, with a revised edition in 1996. granted, i chose to overlook the fact that 1996 was 11 years ago when i read the “too outdated” reviews, assuming that i would just weed out the wrong stuff. the problem was deeper than that. it wasn’t just outdated. it was self-righteous and biased against any sort of research or new and upcoming advances. i could write an entire post about how blatantly they turn anecdotal evidence into facts and how every mention of some new discovery/technology was used as an argument about how little we know, not how much we’re learning.
for example: in a chapter about the dangers of fetal monitoring during labor, it mentions that doctors will sugarcoat all the benefits while downplaying or going so far as to not mention the risks and dangers of using the monitor. which is exactly what the book was doing about almost everything. the blatant hypocrisy was so pervasive that i struggled to get past it, and i pride myself on being able to sift through such things.
this book towed the “women have been doing this for thousands of years and modern medicine is ruining the experience” more aggressively than any book/article i’ve come across, yet. and it’s not like i haven’t been looking. it also went out of it’s way to insist that if you do everything it says perfectly correctly, you can have a completely intervention-free and pain-free birthing experience. the author insisted that if you had any pain, or anything didn’t go exactly to your plan, it was because you failed either in preparing, let the evil doctors take control, or didn’t believe in the method strongly enough. that’s right. if you don’t have faith that it will work out, it won’t. it’s all your fault.
the paradox of the whole thing was that the bits of it that did validate what i was looking for were so completely overshadowed by the propaganda that i can’t trust any of it. i can’t look at it and say, “well 85% of it is clearly bunk, but the 15% that i find useful is probably completely legit.” i doubt this book would even be helpful for someone who was pro home/no-tech birth because of the pressure it puts on you to be perfect. you really have to be on your toes to weed through all of it, and come out with anything of value on the other side.
in short: stay away. there’s not enough to be useful, no matter what your goals are.